SSC Toolbox Social Source Commons Blog

Nonprofit Tech, Tools and Social Media

A program of Aspiration 
Aspiration 

2010 Nonprofit Software Development Summit Dates Announced

By Matt on August 19, 2010

Have you heard of Aspiration‘s Nonprofit Software Development Summit? It is THE place to connect with other people just like you who care about software and technology in the nonprofit sector. Let me emphasize that. Connect. With PEOPLE. This is not the place to sit down in a room and listen to a keynoter talk at you. No. We believe that the greatest resource and benefit that you can get from a conference like the Dev. Summit is the people who are around you. Users, abusers, developers, reverse-engineers and people who just want to know how to Drupal a Ruby’s rails with a CRM.

Our sessions are designed as discussions around a theme. There are no keynoters, just facilitators. This is a place to learn new things, meet cool (sometimes bizarre) people, get involved in great conversation and ultimately connect with what has become an incredible Aspiration family. I HIGHLY encourage you to at least sniff around the website if you are at all interested in connecting with others concerned with software and tech for the nonprofit and social justice sector.

The dates have been announced for this year (November 15-17) and we want to hear from you about what sessions you’d like to see! Let us know by leaving a comment on this post, Aspiration’s Facebook wall, tweeting at us or emailing info@aspirationtech.org.

To give you a better idea about what it’s like, check out the photos below:

Look!  Here.  On the Floor! Sidewalk Tech
It's this Big Wired Collaboration
Dev Summit Scary Face

It’s such a blast. Don’t miss out. More info about registration will be up soon! ๐Ÿ˜€



Dashboarding Guide from Netvibes

By Matt on August 12, 2010

Our favorite dashboarding tool Netvibes has put together a Dashboarding Guide that inventories Monitoring and Analytics tools available to track your presence online (similar to putting together a Social Source Commons Toolbox).

It’s nice to have a document describing these tools while explaining their individual integration options with Netvibes. Tools are categorized by “Monitoring”, “Listening” and “Analyzing.” However, in my opinion, it’s hard to find practical differences between the “Monitoring” and “Listening” tools. What does a “monitoring” tool do different than a “listening” tool, I ask you? Regardless, each category takes you to a list of tools and while there isn’t much of a guided walk-through, the breadth of the tools covered is impressive. Each tool page has information about the tool as well as a place to leave comments and ratings similar to SSC Tool Comments (*cough* plug *cough*).

Netvibes Dashboarding Guide

Overall, it’s great that Netvibes is putting this list together as more and more monitoring tools start coming out of the woodwork and as it becomes even easier to put together a comprehensive Social Media Dashboard. I wish there was more of a guide to how to use the “Guide” as when I first heard about it, I thought it was going to be more of a walk-through about using these tools effectively in your dashboard. Also, more filter options and designations for tools that require outside accounts (as in outside of the widget you add to your dashboard) would be much appreciated.

That being said, Netvibes has told us that this is just the first iteration so hopefully this Dashboarding Guide will mature into a great resource for those trying to navigate the world of social media tracking! So check out Netvibe’s Dashboarding Guide and let me know what YOU think!

Related Articles:



Dearest NULL

By Matt on August 10, 2010
Sorry

In a pretty embarrassing snafoo (snafu?), our Desert Island Tool Email Blast, sent through Vertical Response, addressed many of our members as “NULL” rather than “Friend.”

This, of course, is a fail for mail merge, or when information from an address book (in our case, SSC users’ first names) is taken and automatically placed into the email. Most mail merge-ers give you an option for when a person’s record doesn’t have the requested information. So, for example, if Jimmy Potter didn’t provide his first name on his Social Source Commons account, mail merge gives us an option to provide another word to put in its place. I chose “Friend.” However, it looks like somewhere in the magic tubes of mystery and voodoo (otherwise known as computers and the internet), this broke down so that if a user did not supply a first name, instead of “Friend”, their first name was replaced with “NULL.”

As one of our users put it, it’s “Not so friendly to address your subscribers with ‘Null’…” (with all due respect to those actually named “NULL”). So if you are one of the unfortunate souls to have received a message to “NULL” rather than your (I’m sure) beautiful and lovely first name, we whole-heartedly and sincerely apologize. My bad.

Also? I now hate all online communications.

…kidding…

๐Ÿ˜‰ Matt



Social Media Litter vs. Valid Content

By Matt on July 28, 2010

Recently, Allyson Kapin of FrogLoop posted a blog post on social media contests: Online Fundraising Contests: Effective or Digital Litter. I thought this was pretty intriguing because it brought up the question of what is valid content in social media, anyway?

Trashy Cats
Trashy Cat photo courtesy of funadium

“Litter”, as I imagine it in the social media sense, is a category of content types (tweets, blog posts, updates, etc.) that one ignores as something that is annoying or of no value to whoever is reading it. Disposable. However, some social media sites like Twitter find value in disposability. “Tweets” are limited to 140 characters and rather than the actual post being that which you care about, they usually announce something that you then research further or they redirect you themselves with a shortened URL.

If you agree with my thought that tweets are disposable, then where does the valid/litter distinction come in? Could all tweets be considered “litter” in the social media sense? Is it more “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure” situation where “litter” is in the eye of the beholder? Or is there more of a black and white situation that nonprofits or organizations can live by to ensure their social media efforts are not litter similar to the belief that everyone thinks that telephone marketers are from the devil?

What do you think? What about other social media sites? How is their “litter” different?



What Would YOUR TechFinder Look Like?

By Matt on July 22, 2010

As TechSoup Global retires TechFinder.org, Aspiration is delighted to be working with them to transition the TechFinder data to a new home, and excited to hear from you about what is most needed in terms of a resource directory for nonprofit technology services.

As our good readers (hopefully) know, Social Source Commons and Answr platforms already provide essential information on nonprofit technology. SSC is the largest inventory of software relevant to nonprofit needs, and Answr is an emerging resource that seeks to aggregate knowledge about best practices for nonprofit technology processes, from email to web publishing to social media.

Our plan is to integrate the TechFinder knowledge with these existing resources to provide contextual information on โ€œwho can help you with whatโ€.

How will we do that? As with everything we do, we are taking a community-driven approach to the opportunity. We’ve already had a number of great discussions with friends and allies, and now we hope to hear from you.

What would YOU like Techfinder to be? Email us with your thoughts and suggestions at techfinder@aspirationtech.org. We promise to write back!

Want to be among the first to get updates as we move forward? Just let us know how to reach you, and if you’re so inclined, share your thoughts on what the future of the TechFinder data should be, and how it could be most useful to you and yours.

And if you are a nonprofit technology service provider who has any concerns about what we plan to do with the TechFinder data, please be in touch, let us know your concerns and whether you’d like to opt out of any future TechFinder data deployment.



What’s Your Desert Island Tool?

By Matt on July 16, 2010
Desert Island

Those working in nonprofits and other NGOs use a ton of software everyday. Just look at the New Tools coming into Social Source Commons! I’ll give you a nickel if you’ve heard of half of ’em. A NICKEL.

Nonprofit professionals are working in an world of extremely diverse topic areas and campaigns which means that the software tools that they rely upon are extremely different from end to end. Some are super esoteric like Visor, described on SSC as “…a plugin for the Mac OS X Terminal that makes it a dropdown HUD that you can access via a keyboard shortcut (quake-style).” Some, on the other hand, everyone knows and is tied to for better or worse. Ever become completely dependent on a Firefox add-on and then have to switch to, say, Opera or Chrome or God-forbid Internet Explorer? Yeah, that’s going to ruin your weekend.

We here at Social Source Commons want to know where you fall into that spectrum.

Add Your Tool

So, tell me good reader, What would be your “desert island tool” that you wouldn’t be able to live without?

Tell us and share your sweet software secret to the world!

Add it to the Desert Island Toolbox on Social Source Commons and leave a custom description telling us why you’d be cold and alone without it. Or Leave a Comment on this post. Or Tweet @SSC_Tweets. Or leave us a Facebook post. So many options! Just let the nonprofit world know what tool puts the tickle in your wiggle. ;P



Twitter Policy Head-Scratchers

By Matt on July 7, 2010

Twitter Help

There are many questions to ask yourself when putting together a policy for your organization’s Twitter account and Aspiration and Social Source Commons are asking them. Because of the casual, disposable nature of Twitter’s medium, organizations may think that they don’t have to pay as strict attention to it as an online communications channel. However, it still represents the organization in a person-to-person way that other channels do not approach. This familiarity is great for creating an approachable presence for your organization but many issues can come up where it’s useful to have a document for those administering the org’s account to refer to. I wanted to throw out some of the questions that I’ve had while putting together a Twitter policy doc for our Aspiration Twitter account as well as the Social Source Commons Twitter account:

What Criteria is Retweetable by Request?

Because our Aspiration account has a substantial number of followers, we get a lot requests to tweet or retweet things from our friends, colleagues and partners. However, we also get quite a few random @ messages from strangers asking us to check something out or retweet it. Most of the time, these are spammy or just incoherent and therefore easily ignorable. However, there are times when we pause. How about the for-profit but non-profit-relevant start-up looking for trial users? Or the politically-charged tweet from one of our partner organizations? Deciding what we want to stamp with our approval can become pretty gray.

Who Exactly are They Trying to Talk To? Me, Her, Him or our E.D.?

One of the interesting things that happens when you work from within a single organization account (rather than using a personal account), is that people don’t know who they’re talking to. In my experience, this means they talk to whoever they want. “Hey, it was great seeing you yesterday! Let me know how I can help!” or “Hey, I could really use some comments on this blog post!” are just vague enough to be confusing as to who they are talking to. Most of the time, this isn’t a big problem for us at all, but I could see someone tweeting something urgent for our E.D. only to get me in response. Some orgs sign their tweets with initials (e.g. ^MG) or have individual work accounts but how do you address audience splintering?

Retweeting, Quoting, Translating and Changing Others’ Tweets

Sometimes organizations and people have long Twitter handles which means, among other things, attributing them in a Retweet can take up a lot of dang space. Whether you say RT @aspirationtech via @aspirationtech (with or without parentheses) or (my personal favorite) @aspirationtech, you’ve still lost at a minimum 15 characters. This is no big deal of course unless the person you’ve retweeted has used up all 140 characters in their tweet. How the hell are you going to find 15 extra characters? After changing all the “and”s to &s and “are”s to Rs, you may have to change some stuff to make it fit. 99% of the time, this shouldn’t matter, but what about that 1% when it does?

How about when someone tweets in another language? Do you ask their permission to RT it in different language than they used? Do you just go for it?

What Would You Do?

How would you tackle these Twitter-nundrums? What unique circumstances have occurred in your social media pursuits? How do you address them?



Tools for Social Change

By Matt on June 24, 2010
USSF2010

Aspiration (mama org to Social Source Commons) is spending the week here in Detroit, MI for the 2010 United States Social Forum. USSF is a gathering place for activists, non-profits and people concerned with social justice and inequality in society. There’s an incredible number of people here (~20,000) and Aspiration is working with the Tor Project, The Ruckus Society, Rainforest Action Network and Radical Designs to put on the Online Organizer’s Lab here in the People’s Media Center.

The Online Organizer’s Lab is a place for participants to not only access the internet, but edit audio and video as well as attend some of the trainings that Aspiration does around things like Building a Social Media Dashboard, Taking Advantage of RSS, Keeping Your Privacy Online and Putting Together a Publishing Matrix.


However, the (much argued) best part of this lab is that our computers are using Ubuntu, a Linux operating system (an open source alternative to Windows XP or Mac OS X) installed by Wubi. This means participants get to play with a lot of open source software like OpenOffice, Audacity and PiTiVi Video Editor.

Free and open source software is a great option philosophically for those working in social justice and nonprofit work because not only is the software free (there are a few exceptions) but open source programs have communities of developers that work on the software for no pay (again, there are a few exceptions) because they believe in providing free, quality tools that aren’t attached to shareholders or corporations that are after money. Rather, they are committed to software produced by people who have the users in mind. Open source software and FOSS (Free & Open Source Software) or FLOSS (Free (Libre) Open Source Software) are community-produced, maintained and supported projects that live and die with the people.


FOSS tools provide nonprofits with a great option for their organizational technology needs. Many use common FOSS tools like Drupal, Joomla, Plone and WordPress for their organizational website, CiviCRM for their contact management or just OpenOffice for their word processing and spreadsheet needs. There are a ton of open source options out there and I encourage you to try a search for “open source” on SSC to explore some of the great, free tools that developer communities have developed for users just like you.

Hanging out at the U.S. Social Forum has introduced us to many die-hard open source-ers and it’s inspiring to see and hear their passion for community-designed, built and managed software that everyone can enjoy.

Do you use open source software at your organization? What has your experience been?



I’m Monitoring Social Media… Now what?

By Matt on June 11, 2010
Duck Talking
We All Want To Be Heard
Photo Courtesy of tifotter

With all of this “listening” talk about finding out when people are talking about you online (“Building a Social Media Dashboard” & “Social Media Listening“), the natural question that comes up almost immediately is “So what do I do when someone talks about us online?” I thought I would give you some suggestions about taking advantage of these “mentions” and see what you thought.

The first thing to remember is that this is social media. Not press release media or give-us-money media. These social networks are made to facilitate conversation and networking. Different networks have slightly different tones but in general, I think it’s useful to conduct yourself as if you’re having coffee with the person you’re talking to. Don’t try to sell your organization, just talk to them as a person. It’s person to person not P.R. person to P.R. person. With that in mind, here are my suggestions to ways to take advantage of mentions online:

Thank Them

It’s only polite to thank the person who is sharing your resources or talking positively about your organization. However, I advise that a simple “Thanks!” is only acceptable in the small, informal and disposable world of Twitter. In other social media publishing mediums, comments stick permanently to the same post so you need to be sure to add something relevant to the conversation.

Point Them to a Resource

Sometimes a mention online can serve as an introduction. Depending on the context, pointing the audience to further resources is a great way to take advantage of people already paying attention. For example, if an org talks about you as an ally on a specific Proposition on Facebook, leave a comment saying “You can find more about our position on Prop 47B and how we feel it affects low income commuters here:”

Ask Them a Question

“Joining the Conversation” as they say can sometimes feel a little awkward or difficult. A good way to get involved if you don’t necessarily have anything to add is to ask a question. For example, if someone recommends one of your org’s resources, something like “Thanks for sharing our resource! How do you think we could make it more valuable to your audience?” encourages interaction much more than “Thanks for mentioning us!” Giving people conversational hand-holds is a great way to increase and strengthen connections, show you care as an organization as well as show them that there’s a person behind that organizational facade.

Introduce Them to Someone Else

An awesome way to take advantage of social networks and media is to connect your peers and those around you to each other. It may not lead to immediate gains for yourself or your organization but creating a strong network in your field is no doubt a great way to strengthen your “brand” in the long run. For example, if someone recommends your name as a great org doing good things in housing reform, thank them and talk about the other orgs doing great things in the same field. Everybody gets mentioned, attention and everybody wins. ๐Ÿ˜€

Make Sure your Landing Page isn’t Dusty

All of this mentioning means that (hopefully at least) your online real estate is getting a little bump in traffic. Monitoring social media allows you to see where others are pointing people to on your website. Knowing where people are landing is the first step in sharing with them what you want them to see. If a resource of yours went viral and the link that everyone is retweeting points to a page with no information about your org, that’s a missed opportunity. Remember that your home page is rarely the page that strangers land on. Make sure the pages on which people are getting acquainted with your org have the links and information that you want them to see.

When Not to Respond

Controversial issues, angry commenters, open discussion forums… These are all red flags to make you pay extra attention (or not) to a mention. Sometimes the best response is no response at all. Know when to pick your battles if you’ve been mentioned in a heated exchange about a controversial issue and know that even though some social networks are more informal than others, you still are representing your organization. Also realize that sometimes getting alerted about mentions isnโ€™t about conversation but about knowing those who are connected to your issues.

Concluding Thoughts

  • Simple “Thanks!” are always welcome on Twitter because Twitter is meant for small disposable, forgettable information but blog comments and other more permanent posts stick forever so they need to have more substance than a simple “Thanks!”
  • Sometimes the best response may be no response at all
  • Social networks are all about strengthening connections between people and orgs. “Strengthening” here means being friendly and sharing in conversation. If you didn’t care, you could set up a script to automatically say “Thanks!” anytime someone mentions your or your org online. Try to show whoever talks about you that YOU, the person, actually care and appreciate it.
  • As much as I loathe the phrase “Join the Conversation” (I’ll buy a beer for anyone who comes up with something better), it does encapsulate what’s going on in a social network. A conversation is being had about you and the only thing that is stopping your voice from being heard is you not speaking up. Speak Up!

What advice would you add/change for the n00b social media monitor?



Toolbox for Smaller Nonprofit Organizations

By Matt on May 27, 2010

Recently, Charise Van Liew of fuseDC put together a toolbox entitled Toolbox for Smaller Nonprofit Organizations that was filled with tools that fuseDC recommends to, you guessed it, smaller nonprofits. fuseDC describes their organization as:

fuseDC is a cost-free, interactive support network by and for social justice professionals in Washington DC. We seek to inform, connect and strengthen local emerging leaders working for positive social change with a focus on the empowerment of low-income DC youth.

This is a great example of how nonprofits can take advantage of toolboxes on Social Source Commons by putting together toolboxes that can then be shared, embedded, customized, shared further, you name it.

People love recommendation lists. On Twitter, users are always posting links to articles like “10 tools to make you show up #1 in Google” and “15 ways to turn your email newsletter into a blockbuster movie.” And it’s no wonder. Lists are great! They’re compact, easy to scan, easy to digest and super flexible. Toolbox for Smaller Nonprofit Organizations is set up as a recommendation list of tools and sites for smaller nonprofits to take advantage of.

Which when you think about it, is an interesting question to think about. What do smaller nonprofit organizations need that larger organizations don’t? Many of the tools that come to mind for me are tools that automate processes that a larger org might have a staff person do. It looks like Charise was thinking the same way. WordPress, MeetingWizard, Google Voice, Eventbrite… All of these tools are low cost and seek to simplify their respective tasks.

How do you think larger organizations view these same tools?
Where do “Tools Used” overlap for small and large nonprofits?

What would you put into a toolbox for smaller nonprofit organizations?




Connect with SSC


RSS Feed  Twitter  Facebook

Aspiration Publications